Postby Matty_the_Emo_Slayer » Wed Oct 09, 2013 11:07 pm
I've been enamoured with him ever since a friend sent me some clips of his early days in NXT, but it's taken me a long time to figure out Bray Wyatt. Now that I have I think he has the potential to be the greatest character in wrestling of all time.
I've been saying for ages now that the traditional categories of heel and face are pretty much dead- Wyatt not only alludes to that in his promos (there is no right and wrong anymore) but proves it- put him against any babyface in the company right now bar Cena and he'll get more of the crowd on his side. There was even people booing Kofi when he went for the Boom Drop last Sunday. I think someone in here said in relation to Ambrose having his name chanted despite being such a heel that in this day in age fans are smarter and value great wrestling more than good guy/bad guy cliches and that's why. That kind of counts for Wyatt too as I do think he's a quality wrestler- not showy or flashy, but fundamentally great and very smart. I can see similarities to his dad, but he's much better than that. What's really great about Wyatt is the character.
The reason why Austin, Mankind and CM Punk are the 3 greatest characters in wrestling history is because a) we were never told to chant for them, it developed organically and that's why it never felt forced and b) they tapped into the feelings of the people watching.
Austin clicked with all the blue collar guys who had been fucked over by Reaganomics in the 80's and left behind by the technological advancement of the 90's. Everyone wanted to be Austin because they wanted to live in a world where they didn't have to compromise their values to keep financially stable and could solve problems with old fashioned fighting. Who wouldn't want to give their boss a stunner if they lived in that sort of world?
Mankind connected because he represented triumph over the corporate world by proving that even the least likely could achieve anything (though arguably this is an endorsement of free market capitalism rather than a killing of it), and also because he bucked all it's strictures by being as weird and as outlandish as he wanted to be. That and I think as humans we have a fascination with and a desire to be insane ourselves because it eliminates a certain sense of social responsibility. Ambrose, and to a lesser extent Orton in his heel persona have that element of vicariousness to them as well in a darker form than Austin and Mankind- we don't just want to live free of structure but morality as well.
Whether in his heel persona (particularly the Straight Edge Society) or his babyface one what draws people psychologically most to him is the idea of "the cult of personality" and the community spirit it entails. Rather than the personal tail of overcoming like Daniel Bryan (that allows the establishment to continue claiming it is a meritocracy) has Punk embodies a sort of communal egalitarianism in opposition to it. The perverse aspect of that is that we want to be a part of that so that the weakest among us can cover for our faults that prevent us being as strong as he is. That willingness to give up individual identity for the security of the herd is really prevalent now I think. In America where you have the poverty gap at levels that actually exceed much of the 3rd world and people are worried that the military are actually on the verge of attacking their own citizens and in the UK where the Tories' divide and conquer policies have left us completely disconnected from one another I think it's pretty rational to feel helplessness and to be crying out for a society with a strong figurehead.
Despite all the conflicting parts of these characters (e.g. Ambrose and Orton have their violence legitimated by the establishment that Punk stands against) I think Bray Wyatt is the perfect mix of all 3 types. He comes from the disenfranchised so many people these days can empathise with him, and want to be him because he has been liberated by his insanity caused by the weight of the world, but also we want to follow him because he leads a society that is an alternative to our crumbling in fear and weakness in the enforced individuality we have. We feel for him because he is discarded by the powers above like us, we want to be him because we admire his courage and his freedom from their control, but we want to follow him because we know we are too scared and weak to be like he is.
This storyline involving the corporate administration versus the workforce is the best WWE have done in years, but up til now it has been too safe, just repeating what has gone before (even the family aspect, as awesome as it was, was just following on from Dusty's classic "Hard Times" promo.) People have been talking about getting Punk involved centre stage in this, but I think Wyatt needs to be the one instead. I even think there's the possibility for turning The Real Americans face by joining the Wyatt family. The tea party promos have lost their edge to shock and offend because of the ridiculousness of having Cesaro in the group as well as the increasingly tongue in cheek way Mantel plays the Colter character. Plus, people respect Cesaro and to a lesser extent Swagger too much as wrestlers for them to be serious heels anymore, which is why you hear "We The People" chants so much. The other advantage is they can just concentrate on wrestling while Wyatt does the talking.
In general though, whether its Punk or Wyatt or anyone I think they need to get as much of the mid-card who have potential to involved in this storyline as more than just stand-ins on the stage. It has already worked wonders for Cody Rhodes who at last looks like he's ready to be in the upper echelon- by putting Wyatt and Cesaro in this main event storyline it will be more believable when it comes time to put them in the main event match.
The other reason why I think it would really pay to take the storyline in this direction is because of how I've been seeing some mainstream media attitudes to wrestling changing in the past year. Earlier in the year The Daily Show said that the Real Americans storyline represented a more constructive debate about immigration than the legislature in American is having, and last week Forbes magazine ran a story online praising the Wyatt character. And frankly its no wonder- whether intentional from the writing staff or whether they've just had a series of lucky accidents WWE is slowly starting to make serious TV, even having political and cultural relevance. They would have to get rid of the frivolous stuff like Fandango and the current divas to complete the overhaul, but as it is I think they are starting to challenge the negative attitudes towards the show.
/end rant
Upcoming GigsAug 25|Bangor|PiL+Undertones+XSLF+Outcasts
Sept 7|B'fast|Rose Tattoo+Girlschool
Sept 15|Dub|Cruachan+Skyclad+Waylander
Sept 27|B'fast|RBOTN+Midnight Force
Oct 10|B'fast|Enslaved+High On Fire