Page 832 of 1111

Re: movies

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 7:04 pm
by Darkweasel
Andy Hall wrote:Star Wars does look great at the cinema, I'd love to ser the original trilogy there

I'm lucky enough to have seen all of them at the cinema first time round.
I was five years old when my parents took me to see Star Wars (my first ever trip to the cinema) at my local fleapit in 1977. I didn't remember much about it apart from spaceships exploding near the end.

Saw TESB at Weston Super Mare cinema and clearly remember humming the Imperial March rather loudly while walking back through Dolphin Square on our way back to the hotel.
Leave me alone, I was eight.

Saw ROTJ at Redditch cinema in '83. My parents didn't seem to care much for it but I loved it - Ewoks and all.


Also went on the opening days of the 1997 revamps and Episodes 1-3.

Re: movies

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 7:05 pm
by Slayer-ov-orcs
I just watched Dragon Eyes thinking Van Damme was the lead in it but it turned out he was barely in it. The film was ok though I guess.

Re: movies

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 9:17 pm
by MetalBeast
Saw Bullet To The Head today. It was enjoyable, but rather Channel 5.

Re: movies

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:07 pm
by Turbo
Never did see Django Unchained. Poxy cinema in Germany changed all of its English films so I never went in the end. Most likely wait until it comes out on DVD now.

Re: movies

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:12 pm
by Darkweasel
MetalBeast wrote:Saw Bullet To The Head today. It was enjoyable, but rather Channel 5.

What, full of adverts and Steven Seagal?

Re: movies

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:33 pm
by Luke_X
The Green Hornet - quite a bit shit. Think rip off of iron man minus the humour, charm and awesomeness. Although I did only really watch it cas Christopher Waltz was in it as the villain. 5/10.

I'd like it if they remade this is into a serious film as a 1920s pulp mobster film. It would really work.

Re: movies

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:24 pm
by Andy Hall
I also thouht the guy who played Kato was massively underused, he's one hell of a martial artist

Re: movies

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:54 pm
by Applecore
Just got back from Django Unchained - loved it.

Re: movies

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 10:55 am
by Andy Hall
Just seen the trailer for Fast 6, it looks immense

Re: movies

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 11:50 am
by Darkweasel
Just seen the trailer for Fast 6. It gave me a headache.

Re: movies

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 12:22 pm
by mikeftw
Darkweasel wrote:Just seen the trailer for Fast 6. It gave me a headache.


Why do they persist in that absolute drivel

Re: movies

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 12:25 pm
by Andy Hall
Because they are insanely fun films and people like them :?

Re: movies

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 12:31 pm
by Delightful-Jim
http://moviebob.blogspot.ie/2013/02/wan ... se-of.html


Rumours on Avengers 2 (and 3). They don't seem MASSIVELY plausible but interesting nonetheless.

Also contains massive spoilers.

Re: movies

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 12:56 pm
by Ghost
Andy Hall wrote:Because they are insanely fun films and people like them :?


I'm surprised by this but I agree with Andy :lol: .
I'm not a fan myself but I can see why people like them. Just like I enjoy Rocky films.

Re: movies

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:30 pm
by Darkweasel
I saw Fast and the Furious and hated it. I managed half of the second one before reaching for the remote control and haven't watched any of them since. But hey, that's just me.
My gripe isn't with the movies though, but with the trailer itself.

Do the makers of these films think everyone who watches them suffers from ADD?
FLASH FLASH FLASH FLASH FLASH. Apart from the final couple of shots (which lasted a mighty 2 seconds each), I don't think anything lasted for more than 1.5 seconds on the screen, with the majority lasting just one second or under. It was just "quick! cram everything into a minute before they get bored!".

Easily one of the worst trailers I've ever seen.