Aaaarrrrgggghhhh wrote:Meanwhile those with PC's sit laughing at them & wonder why they don't buy something good.
Too right.
Aaaarrrrgggghhhh wrote:Meanwhile those with PC's sit laughing at them & wonder why they don't buy something good.
Matty_the_Emo_Slayer wrote:Is there an actual science of giving medical diagnosis by sniffing poo? I sometimes have a bit of a wiff from the paper and get curious if it smells different than usual.
CrapyMike wrote:my xbox hasnt broke yet and i've had it nearly 2 years now no need to install my games, and a huge selection of games to choose from, why would i want anything else? there are very few games i want to play on PC and they're not worth the price of a PC good enough to play them
Jobdone wrote:Currently jealous of my mate whose got tomorrow off and can just hammer it for 3 days straight.
RB2610 wrote:CrapyMike wrote:my xbox hasnt broke yet and i've had it nearly 2 years now no need to install my games, and a huge selection of games to choose from, why would i want anything else? there are very few games i want to play on PC and they're not worth the price of a PC good enough to play them
You could easily build a PC that can play any title out on a decent graphical setting for around £300, which is only about £100 more than the 360 (dunno how much PS3's cost).
When you take into consideration that on release PC games retail at about £10 less than their console counterparts, once you have 10 games you've made up for the additional expense, anything after that you're effectively earning money on what you would've paid for a console.
Matty_the_Emo_Slayer wrote:Is there an actual science of giving medical diagnosis by sniffing poo? I sometimes have a bit of a wiff from the paper and get curious if it smells different than usual.
CrapyMike wrote:RB2610 wrote:CrapyMike wrote:my xbox hasnt broke yet and i've had it nearly 2 years now no need to install my games, and a huge selection of games to choose from, why would i want anything else? there are very few games i want to play on PC and they're not worth the price of a PC good enough to play them
You could easily build a PC that can play any title out on a decent graphical setting for around £300, which is only about £100 more than the 360 (dunno how much PS3's cost).
When you take into consideration that on release PC games retail at about £10 less than their console counterparts, once you have 10 games you've made up for the additional expense, anything after that you're effectively earning money on what you would've paid for a console.
my 360 is the arcade one, with my old hard drive, and only cost £100, and there are less than 5 games i would want on PC, so for me its not really worth it. im a very big fan of not being forced to install games when its not necessary as well
in other news, im very near the end of brotherhood now, its actually annoyed me by being mission after mission without the option to do other stuff between, but once i complete it i should have plenty of time for all that
Matty_the_Emo_Slayer wrote:Is there an actual science of giving medical diagnosis by sniffing poo? I sometimes have a bit of a wiff from the paper and get curious if it smells different than usual.